Main Menu

Politically Infiltrated CIA Adds More Lies to the Fire

The once respectable CIA turned Conspiracy Theorists’, latest conspiracy theory is substantiated by nothing more than a desire to lie to delegitimize Trump. Absolutely zero evidence is presented, you’re just suppose to take the word of Obama and Hillary loyalists in the CIA. In fact, the ODNI (the CIA’s parent company) has outrightly said their is no evidence for such an accusation and Wikileaks themselves have said the emails in question were hand delivered to them in a park in Washington DC by a DNC staffer. We can only presume that staffer was Seth Rich. The CIA has no comment.

Excerpted from the laughable Parody News Outlet NBC who completely disregard the criminal content contained with the leaked emails: U.S. intelligence officials now believe with “a high level of confidence” [no evidence, just take our word for it] that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News.

Two “senior officials” who do not wish to be identified for obvious reasons, who claim they have direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used. The intelligence came from “diplomatic sources” and spies working for U.S. allies, the officials, who probably don’t really exist, said.

Putin’s objectives were multifaceted, [once again] a” high-level intelligence source” [who probably does not exist] told NBC News. What began as a “vendetta” against Hillary Clinton morphed into an effort to show corruption in American politics and to “split off key American allies by creating the image that [other countries] couldn’t depend on the U.S. to be a credible global leader anymore,” the fake official said who provided absolutely no evidence to back up his biased opinion.

Ultimately, the CIA has claimed, while providing absolutely no evidence, that the Russian government wanted to elect Donald Trump. The FBI and other agencies don’t endorse that view, but few officials would dispute that the Russian operation was intended to harm Clinton’s candidacy by leaking embarrassing emails about Democrats.

The latest intelligence said to show Putin’s involvement goes much further than the information the U.S. was relying on in October, when all 17 intelligence agencies signed onto a statement attributing the Democratic National Committee hack to Russia.

The statement said officials believed that “only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.” That was an intelligence judgment based on an understanding of the Russian system of government, which Putin controls with absolute authority.

Now the U.S has solid information tying Putin to the operation, the intelligence officials say. Their use of the term “high confidence” implies that the intelligence is nearly incontrovertible.

“It is most certainly consistent with the Putin that I have watched and used to work with when I was an ambassador and in the government,” said Michael McFaul, who was ambassador to Russia from 2012 to 2014.

“He has had a vendetta against Hillary Clinton, that has been known for a long time because of what she said about his elections back in the parliamentary elections of 2011. He wants to discredit American democracy and make us weaker in terms of leading the liberal democratic order. And most certainly he likes President-elect Trump’s views on Russia,” McFaul added. Clinton cast doubt on the integrity of Russia’s elections.

As part of contingency planning for potential retaliation against Russia, according to more unnamed “officials”, U.S. intelligence agencies have stepped up their probing into his personal financial empire.

American officials have concluded that Putin’s network controls some $85 billion worth of assets, even more unnamed “officials” told NBC News.

Neither the CIA nor the Office of the Director of National Intelligence would comment.






Leave a Reply